The
days go past quickly at this time of year.
Everyone has their eyes firmly glued on Christmas, and in the
ever-shortening days there is just time to shuttle backwards and forwards to
school or work. Julie's timetable, which
was being gradually extended to meet new challenges all through last half-term
has now become static, and she struggles to keep up with her existing
challenges. There have been days when
she has lapsed back into the kind of limbo we saw last winter, refusing to go to
school even for the limited number of hours she now attends, and skipping her few classes when she does go in.
I
am looking for a new word to describe the kind of life families like mine lead
during these times. It is something like
persistence or perseverance, but it has to encompass the idea of constantly
working against a strong head-wind, taking tiny steps in blind faith that you
are going forwards. It has to evoke that
spirit of constant reckless optimism, even in the face of absolutely no
supporting evidence, because there is no viable alternative course of action to
take. A bit like Shackleton, but without the heroics (or, sadly, the penguins). Or like gardening if you have a garden like
mine.
I
have spent some of this week researching options for finding private help for
Duncan and his depression. I realise now
that the real problem for me is not so much finding the money (though this is
not to be sneezed at) as finding the time!
When you get down to actually organising therapy imminently, you are
faced with the urgent problem of getting your child to location x at time y,
given the constraints of school, any after-school activities, your own work and
the working hours of the therapist. In
my case I also have to solve the conundrum of what to do with Julie during this
time as well as she usually needs supervision, and has her own timetable to
throw into the mix. Poor Duncan - there
is not much prospect of privacy for him!
But of course I would have found just the same problem had I waited to
reach the top of the NHS waiting list; in fact it would be worse, because I
would have had no choice at all about where or when to take him for therapy.
Julie's
support has been markedly reduced.
Earlier this term I commented on the number of agencies that were
supposed to be providing us with outreach support, and the difficulty of
getting them to coordinate their efforts.
Now, one of the agencies has abruptly decided to stop supporting Julie
without any warning. In some ways this
is a blessing as it was never quite clear just what they thought they were
doing, and they tended to get in the way of some of the other services; but
they withdrew their support in a typically muddled and painful way. Last month, at one of our big planning meetings,
their representative asked the meeting if was appropriate for them to withdraw;
everyone present - Julie, the family and
all the other professionals – considered this
carefully, and agreed no, not just yet, now that they had started work with her
and she had got to know their staff. We agreed
that we would discuss it again at the next planning meeting, though in retrospect
the representative of the agency fell suspiciously quiet at this. Our collective decision, however, was
perfectly clear, so it was a shock to Julie when three days later her support
worker announced that it was her last session with them: they were withdrawing
anyway.
Julie
took it pretty hard, worried that they suddenly thought she was able to cope.
As far as I can tell they think no such thing: the decision does not seem to
relate to any assessment of Julie’s abilities
whatsoever, and it is possible that they don’t actually have a view on her
ability to cope. Just as they did not do
any assessment when they started working with her, to see what they needed to
do, they failed to make any assessment at the end to see if they had made any
improvements or indeed finished their work with her. It was their choice to focus on helping her to
use public transport – they focused on
making a bus trip – but they stopped
short without even checking that she could make a bus trip on her own
unaided. Nor did they seem interested
when I pointed out that our bus service is about to be withdrawn, making bus
travel something of an exotic adventure.
Do they even know or care that she still cannot travel home the mile
from school on her own, whether by bus, foot or bike?
Somewhere
this agency probably has an allotted period of time to work with each patient
that they are not prepared to share with us.
The remaining agencies cannot expand to fill the sudden gap, and so the
additional burden of supporting her falls back on me at a moment’s notice. But at least I no longer have to try and
fathom what this particular agency thinks it is doing and get them to talk to the others
involved in her care. I just wish it had
occurred to them to prepare her for the change, given that they know how
vulnerable she is.
Words fail me!
ReplyDeleteLots of love, hugs and positive vibes.
J xxx
Thanks Joy. It's probably for the best in the long run. I didn't think they would stick around for long when they seemed to have no idea what they were supposed to do.
DeleteDid you know about this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01nt1z4
ReplyDeleteHeard it tonight, thoughts with you xxx
No, I didn't know about this. It's good, isn't it? Love the way they get so much into 15 minutes - very evocative.
DeleteIt's very good isn't it? I got hooked to it this week. Never normally listen to the radio.
Deletewonder if they'll have a .... "if you've been affected by the issues" phone helplines..... ? Nice to see Children in Need stretching their remit....
ReplyDelete