I knew that it was only a matter of time
before somebody suggested that Julie might suffer from Borderline Personality
Disorder. The self harm is a strong
indicator, and as she grew older, and other diagnoses could be ruled out, BPD
was bound to surface. In fact, for the
last year, many of the people who have worked with Julie have dropped
increasingly heavy hints that there was something that might be of interest to
us here. Eventually one of the doctors
took it on himself to talk to Julie about it.
You could argue that doctors often have to give
difficult diagnoses – a terminal disease, dementia etc – but there can be few
diagnoses more difficult to introduce than borderline personality disorder. The very name of the condition is tremendously
unhelpful: most people might assume it
meant that there was something intrinsically defective about the patient – perhaps
even “morally” defective. In fact, even knowing that "borderline" is just a tag that became attached historically to a group viewed as "borderline" between two other diagnoses (both now obsolete), scarcely improves the overwhelming feeling that this group of people has never been viewed with much affection or concern by psychiatrists.
Because Julie has been in hospital so much,
I am never very sure how much she knows about different psychiatric labels. I only got my answer when I sat in on that
very difficult conversation: it was obvious that BPD meant nothing to her, and
that she had not picked up on any of the hints dropped earlier. She listened politely, asked a few questions,
and took away the printed information they had give her. Read about it, have a think, and let me know
if you agree with me, said the doctor cheerfully. It was me that had to seek confirmation that they were not planning to change anything in the meantime: her support, her medication, could continue unchanged for the moment.
It was only 24 hours later that the
problems started. The doctor had not helped
himself with the language he used to describe BPD. It was not an illness, he said, but “just the
way you are”. It took time for Julie to
digest this, and what she finally took away with her was that the doctors had abandoned her. They thought
she was making up her symptoms, they didn’t believe her, she wasn’t “the right
sort of person to be treated”, and they were going to withdraw their support
for her, abandoning her to a kind of personal hell. All the positive messages the doctor had tried
to convey – that the outlook for BPD is good, that treatment makes a
difference, that she was likely to go on to live a happy and productive life,
that she was unlikely to have a degenerative condition like schizophrenia –
were all washed out in the shock of hearing those few words: “just the way you
are”.
She was terribly hurt and confused,
and it was very painful to witness. She stopped taking her medication suddenly and became unwell as a consequence. Nothing I could say to her was the least use. There was no point trying to say that all psychiatric diagnoses carry an element of personal opinion, that it is not clear whether describing one thing as "illness" and another as "personality" makes much difference in practice, and that in 20 years all the labels will probably have changed anyway.
Only time will tell if Julie is reconciled
to this diagnosis, or whether she rejects it.
It probably doesn’t matter a lot in the short term – she will continue
to receive support – and in the longer term it isn’t really clear whether or
not this diagnosis will follow her, and be a help or a hindrance. It is a diagnosis which still attracts a
great deal of stigma, particularly inside the medical profession, but opinions
and practices are changing. I know that
there are people who think that BPD sufferers are time wasters and attention
seekers, but I also know (personally) people who recognize the real
difficulties of managing the condition and who are supportive and caring. If she does live with the label, let’s hope
she meets lots of the latter sort of people.

Hello,
ReplyDeleteI have been following your blog for quite a while now- apologies for never commenting, but after reading today's post on BPD I feel I should share with you my experience. I am not a mother and I do not pretend to know the exact situation Julie is in, whether she has any of the key features of BPD such as affective instability and interpersonal difficulties, but my own experience of using the mental health service somewhat resembles Julie's. At the beginning I was diagnosed as having clinical depression (which was completely wrong, it was actually an insidious prodrome of psychosis but I can't really blame them) but then almost as soon as I turned 18 they wanted to label me with BPD on the basis of my self-harm ALONE. Now, please let me stress that I am not making any assumptions about Julie's case or her psychiatrist, but my first adult psychiatrist is the most incompetent, inexperienced and ignorant 'professional' my family and I have ever had the 'good fortune' to encounter. So no matter what the rapport is like between Julie and her psychiatrist, I am pretty certain it would not be as shocking as what I had to put up with. It was only because of the protest from myself and my family that the BPD diagnosis was never entered into my medical records.
The ironic thing is that I am now a Research Assistant in psychiatry- and I have learnt that self-harm is not, and should never be, a synonym of BPD. In fact, in a conversation with Dr Paul Moran who leads a self-harm service in London he empathised with me that self-harm is by no means at all pathognomonic of BPD. As I said, I am not familiar with Julie's symptoms so am in no place to judge whether this particular diagnosis of BPD is the right one; you wrote very succinctly that they will probably all change in 20 years' time anyway. However, I guess I just wanted to say please be very careful when considering the BPD diagnosis before accepting (or indeed rejecting) it- i.e. on what basis did they make the diagnosis?
I hope I did not offend you; my apologies if I did, please understand I mean well.
Many thanks for reading,
Laurie
Thank you so much for your comment, and you make a very good point. I am so sorry to hear about your experiences.
DeleteI have to say, looking through the list of features that ought to be present in DSM-IV, for example, some of them are so vague that almost anyone could be made to fit them! It makes it a very close call and far from convincing. But I've been told some people do like the diagnosis and find it helpful.
This sounds as though it could have been handled so much better, but perhaps its hard for the professionals to know how each patient will take the diagnosis. So sorry that Julie has been so upset by it, perhaps the relatively good news about the long term outlook will help once she is reconciled to it. Hope you're okay too xx
ReplyDeleteI feel a bit torn really - there are worse diagnoses! But it's obviously a big thing for Julie so I'm bound to be concerned about that. Yes, I think he could have presented it better, but I wouldn't have liked to be the one in his shoes, to be honest.
DeleteMany thanks for replying! Indeed, psychiatric diagnosis is nowhere near the science it should be, especially in personality disorders (it is even debatable whether a personality or Axis II disorder actually 'exists' and whether such a label has any empirical value). A misdiagnosis can be extremely harmful just as an accurate one can be life-saving. I really hope it is the latter case for Julie.
ReplyDeleteIt is quite frustrating how difficult it is - and I'm sure that fashions and styles in diagnosis must come and go just because it is so arbitrary. It would be nice to think that a diagnosis gave you some sort of insight into your difficulties - but so far it's hard to see how it can.
DeleteI've been following your blog quietly for some time - I'm 46 years old and got recently diagnosed with BPD. I can't comment much on whether the diagnosis is right for Julie - as far as I know and experience it, the core of BPD is emotional instability, a neediness that can never be fulfilled, It can have psychotic episodes, but unlike a "true" psychotic people with BPD always know in some corner of their brain, that what they are experiencing is not reality.
ReplyDeleteWhat gives me a lot of hope is that Marsha Linehan, who developed DBT (one of the first successful BPD therapies) suffered from BPD herself, she was in hospital for two years straight as a young woman. She is a well respected academian and "came out" with her story some years ago, you can read it here: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/23/health/23lives.html?_r=0 Maybe this could help to give Julie some hope, too.
Regards,
Cath
Dear Cath, that is such a helpful link. Thank you so much for sending this to me. It makes a big difference to hear her story.
DeleteI've just come across your blog which is such a lifesaver to me. My 18 yr old daughter was yesterday diagnosed with BPD after years of hospitalisation and crazily dangerous self harm. And I thought I was the only parent in this heart rending place. Thank you for this blog.
ReplyDeleteHi Veronica, Im so sorry about your daughter. But I'm glad we've made contact - it's good not to be alone. Best wishes.
DeleteHi, I have read your blog a few times over the last couple of years - usually when I am at a really low point and I am looking for reassurance. My 19 year old daughter has also been diagnosed with BPD and I think that it is helpful to read as much as you can on the diagnosis. My daughter fits the profile really well and it has been invaluable in fighting for the right kind of care for her. The NHS is overloaded and cannot cope with the demand for the Dialetical Behaviour Therapy, which is the most powerful tool in treating BPD. My take on this is that you have to keep fighting for this treatment, or take matters into our own hands (if financially viable). My husband and I found the most wonderful Psychologist who supports our daughter with DBT and we are hopeful of a future for our daughter.I realise this blog was written a couple of years ago and wonder where you are at now with the diagnosis?
ReplyDeleteDear Sally, Thank you so much for getting in touch.
DeleteYes, its been at least 18 months. In that time the BPD diagnosis has stuck and eventually Julie accepted it. However, she still hasn't received treatment! As you say, the NHS is stretched to breaking point. After a couple of pretty spectacular crises, and several hospital admissions, she was assessed by the specialist BPD team as needing treatment. But she has now been a year on the waiting list. Her entire life is on hold as she isn't able to work or study full time. One good result of the diagnosis however is that she has had no further hospital admissions: she has come close, but the advice is to keep BPD sufferers at home if possible, and now this label is on her notes, most of the duty psychiatrists we meet in A&E no longer try to pressurise her to go in.
But I am very glad to hear that you have found some success with private treatment. We've considered this (many many times!). The NHS treatment is always "just about to start" which has made it difficult to know whether it is the right thing to do. I would like to use the local NHS service, which has a great track record - and I have joined a carer's group they run. Apparently she's now near the top of the list - has been for several months - and still no start date. So perhaps one day we will just pay for private care.
I hope your daughter carries on getting better and stronger and you continue to see a future for her. I feel hope for Julie's future, despite the rocky start!
Thanks for being in touch. JM